How One Man's Temper Tantrum Handed Spain's Fighter Contracts to Turkey

May 22, 2026

How One Man’s Temper Tantrum Handed Spain’s Fighter Contracts to Turkey — and What It’s Costing You

After Donald Trump’s retaliatory rage stripped the U.S. military presence from Spain and dissolved a billion-dollar arms deal, Madrid turned to Ankara for its next generation of fighter jets. The consequences for American workers, NATO’s cohesion, and the republic’s democratic stability are only beginning to register.

Sometime in the summer of 2025, a deal worth roughly $7.24 billion — earmarked for American-made F-35 fighter jets, built at Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth facility, employing thousands of American aerospace workers — quietly died. Spain, a NATO ally of seven decades, formally and permanently suspended its negotiations to purchase the F-35 in August 2025. No announcement from the White House. No acknowledgment from the Pentagon. Just the sound of a closing door, and the distant whir of Turkish manufacturing lines spinning up to replace us.

By May 2026, the picture had come into sharp, damning focus. At the SAHA 2026 International Defense and Aerospace Exhibition in Istanbul, Turkish Aerospace Industries CEO Mehmet Demiroğlu confirmed that Spain and Turkey had entered formal government-to-government discussions about Spain acquiring the KAAN — Turkey’s indigenously developed fifth-generation stealth fighter. This is not a rumor. This is not diplomatic posturing. This is the direct, measurable consequence of a foreign policy conducted by tweet, driven by ego, and calibrated entirely to the satisfaction of a 79-year-old president who reportedly threw a hours-long tantrum when allies declined to wage his war.

To understand what happened, you have to understand the cascade: Trump wanted European allies to support and facilitate U.S. military operations against Iran. Spain — under the leadership of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez — refused. Madrid denied American forces the use of Naval Station Rota and Morón Air Base for strikes against Iran. Trump declared Spain “horrible. Absolutely horrible.” Pentagon advisor Elbridge Colby circulated an internal email proposing to suspend Spain from NATO. Trump mused publicly about pulling U.S. troops. The alliance frayed. Spain looked elsewhere for its security partnerships. And Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth production lines lost a contract that should, by every strategic logic, have been theirs.

1. The Billion-Dollar Deal We Handed Away

Spain had been on course to buy American. The Spanish Air and Space Force had identified the F-35A as the preferred successor to its aging F/A-18 Hornet fleet, and the Navy had long viewed the F-35B — capable of short takeoff and vertical landing — as the only viable replacement for its Harrier jets. Spain’s 2023 defense budget had earmarked 6.25 billion euros for new fighter acquisition, and Lockheed Martin’s own executive vice president Greg Ulmer stated publicly that Spain’s naval requirement meant the F-35B was effectively “the only option really.”

The reasons Madrid cited for walking away tell the story of a superpower that has made itself radioactive as an arms partner. According to Breaking Defense and Spain’s own ministry of defense, the decision rested on U.S. restrictions on access to the F-35’s critical technologies; Spain’s concern about a potential American veto on how and where the jets could be deployed; the aircraft’s ballooning price tag; and an explicit desire to support European rather than American defense industries. Quietly left unsaid but widely understood: what nation would lock its air force into software controlled entirely from Washington when Washington has shown it will use that leverage as a political weapon?

Evidence · The Cost of Trump’s Alliance Destruction

Lost Contract Value

Spain had budgeted approximately €6.25 billion (~$7.24 billion) for new fighter acquisition — a figure that would have flowed overwhelmingly to Lockheed Martin’s American production facilities. Eurasian Times, May 2026

The Replacement Deal

Spain has already signed a €3.12 billion contract for 45 Turkish Hürjet trainers. The Turkish Aerospace CEO confirmed this is “the first step” toward Spanish KAAN acquisition. Army Recognition, May 2026

The F-35’s Cancelled Customers

Spain’s cancellation follows Switzerland scaling back purchases. Canada and Portugal have raised operational restriction concerns. National Interest noted these setbacks were “conveniently left out” of Lockheed Martin’s 2025 milestones press release. National Interest, Jan. 2026

The “Kill Switch” Fear

Multiple European partners — including Portugal’s Defense Minister Nuno Melo — have cited explicit concern that the U.S. could withhold F-35 software updates or impose operational restrictions during political disputes as reason to avoid the aircraft. Defense Mirror, Mar. 2025

2. The Tantrum That Started It All

The proximate cause of Spain’s pivot away from the United States was not a carefully reasoned strategic review. It was a pattern of behavior from the Oval Office that European defense planners could no longer ignore. Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez publicly opposed the U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran and, critically, refused to allow the American bases on Spanish soil — Naval Station Rota and Morón Air Base — to be used for strike operations. This was Spain exercising its sovereignty. It was also, by any reasonable measure, Spain operating within its legal rights: the bases exist under bilateral defense agreements, not blank checks for any American military venture.

Trump’s response was to behave not like the leader of the free world, but like a man who has never been told no. He declared Italy and Spain “horrible,” said publicly he was considering withdrawing American troops from both nations, called NATO “useless” and European allies “cowards,” and — through Defense Department policy advisor Elbridge Colby — floated an internal email proposing to suspend Spain from NATO entirely. The email, obtained by Reuters, described the goal as reducing “the sense of entitlement on the part of the Europeans.”

“Why shouldn’t I? Italy has not been of any help to us and Spain has been horrible. Absolutely horrible.”

— President Donald Trump, responding to a reporter’s question about withdrawing U.S. troops from Italy and Spain, May 2026

Trump’s rage was not strategic. It was personal. According to reporting by Time, there were 3,814 U.S. active-duty personnel stationed in Spain as of December 2025. These troops serve at bases that have supported American power projection into the Mediterranean and Middle East for generations. Threatening their removal as punishment for a sovereign ally’s legal decision is not statecraft. It is the behavior of someone incapable of distinguishing personal grievance from national interest — a distinction that lies at the very heart of what the office of Commander in Chief is supposed to require.

Get Involved Today

Contribute to our mission and turn your concerns into action.

3. A Timeline of Self-Inflicted Damage

August 2025

Spain formally ends F-35 negotiations. The Spanish Ministry of Defense confirms it will pursue Eurofighter and FCAS options. Lockheed Martin loses its best remaining European customer. A $7+ billion contract window closes.

October 2025

Spain signs €3.12 billion deal for 45 Turkish Hürjet trainers. Turkish Aerospace officials describe the Hürjet as “the first step” — training pilots for the KAAN. The pipeline toward Turkish fighter dependence is formally established.

April 24, 2026

Leaked Pentagon email proposes suspending Spain from NATO, reviewed by Reuters. Authored by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, the email outlines punitive options against “difficult” allies who denied U.S. bases for Iran war operations.

May 1, 2026

Trump publicly threatens to withdraw troops from Italy and Spain. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth orders a military drawdown in Europe, described as a “thorough review of force posture.” NPR reports allies across Europe are also told to expect weapons supply delays.

May 7, 2026

Turkish Aerospace CEO Mehmet Demiroğlu confirms Spain-Turkey KAAN talks at the SAHA 2026 defense expo in Istanbul. Spain has formally requested information on acquiring a “top-tier fifth-generation fighter.” The alliance fracture is now a documented procurement reality.

4. What This Actually Costs You

Americans who work in defense manufacturing, live near military bases, or depend on a stable international order may be tempted to see Spain’s fighter procurement as a distant geopolitical abstraction. It is not. The F-35 program, produced at Lockheed Martin’s sprawling facility in Fort Worth, Texas, and supported by supply chains touching 45 states, is among the largest single sources of American aerospace employment in existence. Foreign military sales are not charity. They are revenue — revenue that supports engineering jobs in California, avionics manufacturing in New York, propulsion systems in Connecticut, and logistics infrastructure from Alabama to Washington State.

Spain’s cancellation followed Switzerland scaling back its own purchase. Defense Mirror reported that a potential German cancellation alone could cost Lockheed approximately $5 billion. Canada’s deal values each aircraft at roughly $145 million including support and training. Portugal’s defense minister has publicly cited Trump’s erratic behavior as reason to “think about the best options.” The cumulative erosion of allied confidence in American arms represents a slow-moving industrial catastrophe for the workers and communities that produce them.

There is also a security cost that every American carries invisibly. The bases Trump threatened to vacate — Rota and Morón — are not diplomatic tokens. Naval Station Rota hosts forward-deployed U.S. Navy destroyers for operations across the Mediterranean and the approaches to the Middle East. Morón Air Base has long supported Marine crisis-response missions into Africa. According to 19FortyFive, these facilities are integral to American power projection into precisely the regions where the Trump administration has chosen to wage war. Threatening to vacate them as a temper tantrum over a sovereign ally’s legal decisions undermines the military readiness of the country Trump claims to defend.

“Spain is no longer content to be a consumer in Washington’s arsenal; it is reclaiming its role as a co-creator in Europe’s aerial destiny.”

— Defense analyst quoted in Defensa y Seguridad, as reported by Aero News Journal, October 2025

5. The Alliance That Trump Is Dismantling in Real Time

NATO’s post-war value to the United States has never been primarily military. It has been architectural — the institutional guarantee that Western democracies would coordinate, interoperate, and, when necessary, sacrifice together. The F-35 program was explicitly designed to lock allied air forces into a shared technological and logistical ecosystem: compatible avionics, shared mission data libraries, combined training, unified sustainment. Spain buying a Turkish fighter — however capable — is a vote against that architecture. And it is a vote that Donald Trump forced.

Time reported that Trump’s military drawdown announcement came “amid long-simmering tensions” over European refusal to support the Iran war, that Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz had earned Trump’s “ire” for criticizing the conflict, and that the Pentagon has simultaneously told NATO allies to expect delays in weapons deliveries as the U.S. replenishes its own stockpiles. Ukraine, already facing critical shortages of U.S.-made Patriot systems, will also see delays in HIMARS and NASAMS munitions. This is not a foreign policy. This is strategic self-destruction: weakening the alliance structure that has underwritten American security, economic dominance, and global legitimacy since 1949, in exchange for the satisfaction of punishing allies who disagreed with a war that Congress never authorized.

The KAAN negotiations carry a symbolism that transcends aircraft procurement. Turkey — itself removed from the F-35 program in 2019 after purchasing Russian S-400 air defense systems — has turned that exclusion into a competitive advantage. If Spain’s acquisition of the KAAN proceeds, it will mark the first time a Turkish-developed fifth-generation stealth fighter has entered the arsenal of a NATO and European Union member. That is an extraordinary geopolitical outcome — and it is one that the Trump administration has spent the better part of two years making inevitable.

Constitutional Analysis · 25th Amendment, Section 4

The Amendment Built for Exactly This Moment

The 25th Amendment, Section 4 of the United States Constitution provides a mechanism the framers designed for a precise circumstance: a president who is no longer capable of executing the duties of the office. It does not require criminal behavior. It does not require impeachment proceedings. It requires that the Vice President, together with a majority of the Cabinet, transmit to Congress a written declaration that the president “is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.” Congress then has 21 days to vote; a two-thirds majority of both chambers removes the president.

The record of the past several months provides exactly the pattern of conduct this mechanism was designed to address. In April 2026, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, introduced the Commission on Presidential Capacity to Discharge the Powers and Duties of Office Act — backed by 50 Democratic co-sponsors — citing Trump’s “erratic behavior,” including his social media threats to destroy Iranian cities, his posting of AI-generated images depicting himself as Jesus Christ, and his public feud with Pope Leo. NBC News reported that the legislation would establish a 17-member commission to conduct a medical examination of the president within 72 hours of activation.

Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) went further, calling for immediate 25th Amendment action after a Wall Street Journal report revealed Trump had “thrown an hours-long tantrum” at the White House over a military rescue mission for downed airmen — and had been deliberately excluded from commanding the operation because, in the assessment of his own military advisors, his behavior was too erratic to trust. “The commander-in-chief was excluded from commanding a military operation because he was acting so crazy,” Goldman wrote. “Trump is not well.” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker separately echoed the call for 25th Amendment action, with more than 70 Democratic lawmakers formally calling for removal by April 2026.

The legal argument is straightforward: the pattern of conduct documented — threatening sovereign allies with military abandonment as retaliation for legal sovereign decisions, publicly musing about destroying civilian infrastructure in foreign nations, being excluded by his own military from operational command — constitutes precisely the incapacity that Section 4 describes. The practical barrier is equally clear: Section 4 requires the Vice President and a majority Cabinet to act, and this Cabinet has shown no appetite for constitutional self-governance. That barrier is real. But it does not make the constitutional case any less sound — nor does it diminish the moral responsibility of those with the power to act and the clarity to see what is happening.

6. What a Leader Actually Does — And What This Is

Leadership, in the context of the American presidency, has never meant getting everything you want. It has meant managing the gap between national interest and personal preference — consistently, maturely, with an understanding that allies are not vassals, and that the security architecture painstakingly built across 80 years of postwar diplomacy is more valuable than any single moment of dominance.

What the Spain-KAAN episode reveals is a president who cannot manage that gap. When Spain declined to allow American military operations from its bases — a legal, sovereign decision consistent with Spain’s position throughout the war in Iran — the functionally correct response from any president in living memory would have been diplomatic pressure, private negotiation, and the patient management of a disagreement between allies. Instead, Trump publicly humiliated a partner nation, threatened to vacate bases critical to American security posture, circulated punitive memos, and — through the cumulative weight of his behavior — accelerated Spain’s decision to exit the American arms ecosystem entirely. The jobs, the strategic architecture, and the diplomatic standing all walked out the door together.

Admiral General Teodoro López Calderón, Spain’s own Chief of the Defense Staff, stated in July 2025 that Spain had “no alternative with comparable stealth or sensor fusion technology” to the F-35. That was true. And Spain still walked away — because the terms of American partnership have become, under this president, too operationally uncertain, too politically unstable, and too personally humiliating to accept. That is the verdict history will record about this administration’s management of the Atlantic alliance.

Editorial Conclusion

What happened with Spain is not an isolated diplomatic setback. It is a window into the irreversible damage wrought when the most powerful office in the world is occupied by someone whose capacity for strategic reasoning has been overwhelmed by the need for personal dominance. A $7 billion arms deal, a seven-decade alliance, a network of forward bases, and the foundational principle that American partnership means something — all of it sacrificed to the satisfaction of punishing an ally that said no. The 25th Amendment exists precisely because the Constitution’s authors understood that a republic’s survival cannot depend on the character of any single individual. When the conduct of the executive office becomes a clear and documented threat to the security architecture it is charged with defending, the constitutional obligation is not to wait — it is to act. That obligation belongs to the Vice President, to the Cabinet, and to every member of Congress who swore an oath not to a man, but to a document that was written to outlast them all.