The Hidden Toll of Trump's War

May 10, 2026

The Hidden Toll of Trump’s War:
Iran Devastated American Bases — and the White House Is Hiding It

A bombshell NBC News investigation — corroborated by officials, congressional aides, and the conservative American Enterprise Institute — reveals that Iranian strikes caused catastrophic, unreported damage to U.S. military installations across seven countries. The cover-up implicates the Pentagon, the White House, and a commander-in-chief who told the nation Iran had been “obliterated.”

The truth about what Iran did to America’s military presence in the Middle East is now breaking through the fog of official denial — and it is far worse than the Trump administration has told the American people, members of Congress, or anyone else outside a classified circle that has chosen concealment over accountability. A comprehensive investigation by NBC News, drawing on the accounts of three U.S. government officials, two Republican congressional aides, and one additional person with direct knowledge of the damage, paints a picture of systematic destruction: more than 100 targets struck across 11 U.S. military bases in seven countries, billions of dollars in damage to command centers, radar systems, aircraft hangars, runways, and satellite communications infrastructure — and a White House that responded not by informing the public, but by pressuring a private satellite company to go dark.

The Iranian military’s campaign of retaliation, launched after the United States and Israel began Operation Epic Fury on February 28, 2026, targeted American installations across Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia. Among the most symbolically devastating strikes: an aging Iranian F-5 fighter jet — a Cold War-era aircraft that the United States itself provided to Iran before the 1979 revolution — penetrated the air defenses protecting Camp Buehring in Kuwait and dropped ordnance on the base, marking the first time in years that a foreign fixed-wing aircraft had successfully struck an American military installation. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had told the country just weeks before that Iran had “almost nothing” it could militarily do about America’s campaign. An obsolete fighter plane, six decades old, just proved him wrong on American soil — or what passes for it when 13 service members have been killed and nearly 400 more wounded.

1. What the American Enterprise Institute Found

The independent damage assessment that cuts through the Pentagon’s silence comes from an unlikely source: the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington think tank with deep roots in Republican and conservative circles. AEI’s analysis, cited directly by NBC News and The Hill, found that Iran struck more than 100 separate targets across 11 U.S. military bases — a scope of destruction that the Pentagon has refused to confirm, quantify, or communicate to the Congress that funds the military. The estimated cost of repairing the physical infrastructure alone exceeds $5 billion, according to AEI. That figure does not include the replacement cost of destroyed equipment: MQ-9 Reaper drones, a U.S. Air Force E-3G Sentry airborne warning aircraft destroyed at Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia on March 27, multiple KC-135 Stratotanker refueling planes, and helicopters.

AEI senior fellow Mackenzie Eaglen, one of the nation’s foremost analysts of defense budgets and military readiness, did not mince words in her assessment. The future costs of rebuilding American military infrastructure, she told NBC, “may include repair, reconstruction, outright replacement, or even abandonment and decommissioning of locales.” She added that war damage estimates “also include costs for infrastructure that is unsalvageable.” This is not ambiguous. This is a senior defense analyst at a conservative institution stating publicly that some of what Iran destroyed cannot be rebuilt — it can only be written off.

“Nobody knows anything. And it’s not for lack of asking. We’ve been asking for weeks and haven’t received specific details, even as the Pentagon is asking for a record high budget.”

— A Republican congressional aide, speaking to NBC News, April 2026

The breadth of specific facilities confirmed to have been hit is staggering. The NBC investigation and the AEI assessment together identify: the headquarters of the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet in Bahrain, which sustained serious damage; Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait; a runway at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar (home to the largest American air base in the Middle East); a munitions storage site in northern Iraq; Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia; Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan; Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE; fuel storage, medical clinics, hangars, and barracks at Al Ruwais in the UAE; Camp Arifjan in Kuwait; and the Shuaiba Port facility in Kuwait, where six U.S. Army Reserve soldiers died in a March 1 drone attack on what survivors described as an effectively unprotected operations center.

2. The Scale of Damage — By the Numbers

AEI Assessment

100+

Iranian targets struck across 11 U.S. bases in 7 Middle Eastern countries. Source: The Hill / AEI via NBC

Repair Costs (Infrastructure Only)

$5B+

Minimum estimated cost to repair physical infrastructure — not including destroyed aircraft, radar, and weapons systems. Source: Kurdistan 24 / NBC / AEI

Killed / Wounded (Official Pentagon Count)

13 / 400

At least 13 U.S. service members killed; nearly 400 wounded. Some reporting suggests actual figures may be higher. Source: NBC / Pentagon

First Six Days of War

$11.3B

Pentagon’s own figure for military operations cost in the opening six days of Operation Epic Fury — before accounting for repair costs. Source: The Hill

U.S. Gas Prices (National Average)

$4.06/gal

National average gasoline price, up over $1 per gallon since the war began. The Strait of Hormuz closure disrupted 20% of global oil supply. Source: CBS News / AAA

Countries Where U.S. Bases Were Hit

Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia — all host U.S. forces that came under Iranian fire. Source: Peace and Justice Post / NBC

3. How the Cover-Up Was Engineered

When the scale of Iranian retaliation became apparent in early March, the Trump administration made a choice. It did not brief Congress. It did not hold a formal press conference to reckon with the damage. It did not update its public assessment of the war’s progress. Instead, according to NBC News and reporting from Reuters, Bloomberg, and CNBC, the White House asked private commercial satellite companies — led by California-based Planet Labs — to indefinitely withhold imagery of the conflict zone.

Planet Labs sent an email to its customers on April 4, 2026, informing them that it was moving to “a managed access model” and “releasing imagery on a case-by-case basis” after receiving the U.S. government’s request. The blackout applied retroactively to imagery collected from March 9 onward, and, as of the time of publication, remains in effect. Washington Post reporter Evan Hill noted that the restriction would limit access to “one of the most important U.S.-based commercial satellite imagery providers on whom most media outlets rely.” It was The New York Times’ use of earlier, still-public satellite data that had previously exposed before-and-after comparisons of the devastation at U.S. installations — images that contradicted the official narrative of uncontested dominance.

The Pentagon’s own response to congressional inquiries has been almost identical in its stonewalling. A Pentagon spokesperson told NBC: “We do not discuss battle damage assessments for operational security reasons. Our forces remain fully operational, and we continue to execute our mission with the same readiness and combat effectiveness.” U.S. Central Command declined to comment entirely. Meanwhile, two Republican congressional aides confirmed that multiple GOP lawmakers have privately confronted senior Pentagon officials about the information blackout — and been turned away. The aide who spoke to NBC put it with searing clarity: “Nobody knows anything. And it’s not for lack of asking.”

4. A Chronology of Destruction — and Deception

February 28, 2026

The United States and Israel launch Operation Epic Fury with strikes on Iran. Tehran immediately begins retaliating against U.S. bases across the Gulf region.

February 28–Early March

U.S. Navy Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain sustains “serious damage.” Bases in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar are struck in rapid succession.

March 1, 2026

An Iranian drone targets Shuaiba Port, Kuwait, killing six U.S. Army Reserve soldiers and wounding more than 20. Survivors describe the facility as effectively unprotected despite Hegseth’s assurances.

Early March

An Iranian F-5 fighter jet — a 1959-era aircraft — penetrates air defenses and strikes Camp Buehring in Kuwait. The first enemy fixed-wing attack on a U.S. military base in years goes unannounced by the Pentagon.

March 4, 2026

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth tells reporters that the U.S. and Israel will achieve “complete control” of Iranian airspace — “uncontested” — within days. He says Iran has “almost nothing” it can militarily do about American operations.

March 9, 2026

The White House requests that satellite imagery companies withhold all imagery of the conflict zone from this date forward. The blackout will later be formalized and extended indefinitely.

March 13, 2026

An Iranian missile and drone attack on Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia destroys a U.S. Air Force E-3G Sentry aircraft, damages multiple KC-135 Stratotankers, and wounds several U.S. service members.

March 25, 2026

The New York Times, using still-available satellite data, reports that many of the 13 U.S. bases in the region “are all but uninhabitable,” with Kuwait facilities suffering the most. The report directly contradicts official statements.

April 4, 2026

Planet Labs officially notifies customers — including major news outlets — that it is indefinitely withholding imagery at the U.S. government’s request. The retroactive cutoff is March 9.

April 25, 2026

NBC News publishes its exclusive investigation based on six sources, the AEI assessment, and specific damage to named bases. The Pentagon declines to comment. The White House declines to comment. Trump says Iran has been “obliterated.”

5. The Economic Wound the Country Cannot Ignore

Even Americans who have followed no military news since February know the war is real — because they feel it at the pump. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly 20 percent of the world’s oil flows daily, has delivered what the International Energy Agency has described as the “largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market.” Brent crude surged above $100 per barrel in early March. Average gasoline prices in the United States hit $4.06 per gallon nationally as of late April, according to AAA — up more than $1 per gallon since the war began, and above pre-war levels of $2.98 by any optimistic trajectory.

The inflationary shock extends well beyond gasoline. According to CBS News, economists at EY-Parthenon, Goldman Sachs, and the Cato Institute project that the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index could reach 4 percent by year’s end — double the Federal Reserve’s 2 percent target. Goldman economists Jessica Rindels and David Mericle have written that the combination of oil-driven inflation and labor market softening is keeping the Fed “firmly in wait-and-see mode,” delaying rate cuts and elevating borrowing costs. The New York Fed’s Global Supply Chain Pressure Index hit its highest level since January 2023. Summer air travel is becoming more expensive as jet fuel prices rise. Higher diesel prices mean higher grocery bills. The Century Foundation has projected that these effects — which it calls “forever costs” — will compound in ways that outlast any ceasefire.

“Consumers, of course, want deflation, and we’re definitely not getting that. We should expect things to remain higher than what people want.”

— Scott Lincicome, Vice President of General Economics, Cato Institute, speaking to CBS News, April 2026

When asked about rising gas prices, President Trump replied: “If they rise, they rise.” That five-word dismissal — from a man who campaigned on economic relief for working families — encapsulates the administration’s entire approach to the human cost of this war. Congress, meanwhile, is weighing a supplemental funding package that could exceed $100 billion. The Pentagon entered this war already operating on a $1 trillion defense budget — the largest in U.S. history — and is now requesting additional billions while simultaneously refusing to tell lawmakers what those billions already purchased, or what Iran succeeded in destroying.

Get Involved Today

Contribute to our mission and turn your concerns into action.

6. What This Says About Trump’s Leadership — and Its Dangers

It is worth pausing on what has actually happened here, stripped of the noise. The United States entered a shooting war with a regional power. That power struck back, hitting more than 100 targets across 11 American military installations in seven sovereign countries, using missiles, drones, and aircraft — including, extraordinarily, an aircraft the United States gave Iran four decades ago. The damage runs into billions of dollars. American service members are dead and wounded. The global oil market is in historic disruption. And the official response from the President of the United States and his Defense Secretary has been a cascade of demonstrably false claims: “uncontested airspace.” Iran has “almost nothing” it can do. The country has been “obliterated.” Trump maintains the U.S. is doing “unbelievably well.”

These are not ordinary political exaggerations. They are assertions about the life-and-death operational reality of an active war, made to a public whose sons and daughters are serving in harm’s way — in facilities that are, according to The New York Times’ reporting, “all but uninhabitable.” The gap between what senior officials said publicly and what their own intelligence knew was happening is not the fog of war. It is the architecture of a cover-up. The administration asked Planet Labs to blind the press. It refused to brief Congress. It declined to provide cost estimates to the lawmakers who are being asked to write the checks. This is not how a functional executive branch under constitutional governance operates. This is how a leader who prioritizes the appearance of strength over the safety of the republic behaves.

The 25th Amendment and the Case for Accountability

I. What the Amendment Provides

Section 4 of the 25th Amendment to the United States Constitution allows the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet to transmit a written declaration to Congress asserting that the President “is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.” If the President contests that declaration, a two-thirds supermajority of both the House and Senate must sustain it for removal to take effect. The mechanism was designed for incapacity — but constitutional scholars note that it encompasses not merely physical inability, but the demonstrated failure to competently execute the duties of the office in ways that endanger the republic.

II. Who Has Called for Its Use

Following President Trump’s April 5, 2026, Truth Social post threatening to bomb Iranian power plants and bridges in an expletive-laced Easter Sunday message — subsequently corroborated by the catastrophic intelligence gap between his public statements and documented battlefield reality — Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) wrote publicly: “If I were in Trump’s Cabinet, I would spend Easter calling constitutional lawyers about the 25th Amendment.” Rep. Yassamin Ansari, Rep. Melanie Stansbury, and Sen. Bernie Sanders echoed the call. Sen. Ed Markey raised it as early as January 2026.

III. The Constitutional and Legal Argument

The argument for applying the 25th Amendment here is grounded not in partisan grievance but in documented fact: the President of the United States, while prosecuting an undeclared war, has repeatedly made public claims — about air dominance, about Iran’s military capacity, about the damage sustained by American forces — that were directly contradicted by assessments held by his own intelligence community. He has presided over an administration that actively suppressed satellite imagery, withheld casualty and damage assessments from Congress, and used the apparatus of government to conceal from the American people information about the conduct and consequences of a war being waged in their name. This is not a president making imperfect wartime judgments. It is a president whose demonstrated detachment from operational reality, and whose deliberate concealment of that reality from those constitutionally empowered to oversee him, raises urgent questions about his fitness to continue exercising command authority.

IV. The Practical Barriers

The barriers to invoking Section 4 are formidable. Vice President JD Vance has shown no indication of challenging Trump’s authority. Republican Cabinet members, who would need to constitute a majority, have uniformly supported the president’s war narrative. Even if Democrats could demonstrate the evidentiary case — and the NBC investigation gives them significant material — the two-thirds threshold in a Republican-controlled Congress is, at present, an essentially insurmountable obstacle. Constitutional law professor Joel K. Goldstein of Saint Louis University and Michigan State’s Brian Kalt have both noted that the amendment’s invocation against a resistant president and compliant Cabinet is, practically speaking, extraordinarily difficult.

V. Why the Barriers Do Not Negate the Moral Case

The near-impossibility of removal does not make the constitutional case irrelevant — it makes it more urgent. The drafters of the 25th Amendment understood that it might sometimes function as moral and political indictment rather than legal remedy. A president who deceives Congress, suppresses evidence of military failure, dismisses rising gas prices with a shrug, and celebrates the “obliteration” of a country that just bombed 11 American military installations has not simply made poor decisions. He has demonstrated a pattern of behavior — detachment from reality, contempt for institutional accountability, and the weaponization of government machinery against transparency — that the amendment was designed precisely to name. Congress has not only the right but the constitutional obligation to make that naming public, even where the political arithmetic forecloses removal. The democratic record must reflect what occurred.

Editorial Conclusion

An Iranian air force running 1959-era fighter jets just punched through the defenses of the most powerful military in human history and struck American bases in seven countries — while the President of the United States told the public that Iran had been “obliterated.” The damage runs to billions of dollars, the satellite images have been suppressed, Congress has been stonewalled, and 13 American service members are dead. This is not a leadership failure at the margins. It is a systemic betrayal of the public trust, the constitutional order, and every family who sent a son or daughter to serve at those bases. The American people deserve a government that tells them the truth about a war being waged in their name, with their money, at the cost of their security. Until the Pentagon briefs Congress in full, until the satellite blackout ends, and until the President stops describing a $5 billion catastrophe as a victory, the press and the Congress must treat this not as a political dispute, but as what it is: an active crisis of democratic accountability, with the republic’s credibility — and the lives of its service members — on the line.