The Man Who Was One Appointment Away
Lorenzo Salgado Araujo drove his crew to a jobsite in Houston’s East End. He never made it back home. His killing by a masked federal agent — a ninth known death since this administration unleashed its enforcement surge — is not an aberration. It is the design.
0
According to a source with preliminary knowledge of the incident who spoke to CNN, Salgado Araujo was not the target of the ICE operation that intercepted him. He was collateral. ICE says he “weaponized” his vehicle. His family says he was frightened, that he was trying to protect his tools and his workers, that no one from the Department of Homeland Security has yet contacted them. There is no body-camera footage, because — as a DHS spokesperson conceded to CNN — the officers involved had not yet been issued cameras. More than a year into an administration that expanded ICE’s field operations at breakneck speed, more than half of ICE field offices still do not have working body cams. The agency blames government shutdowns. The dead man’s family, and the Harris County District Attorney’s office, would very much like to see the footage that does not exist.
Ronaldo Salgado stood at a news conference on Wednesday, flanked by Democratic Representatives Sylvia Garcia and Christian Menefee, and refused to let his father be reduced to a headline. “He did not deserve to die,” he said. “He did not deserve to be reduced to a headline of ‘Mexican man shot and killed by ICE.'” His father, he told reporters, “dedicated his life to giving his family the American dream.” The Houston Chronicle, in an editorial titled bluntly ICE Lies. And now they’ve killed a Houstonian, called on the people of the city to “stand up for one another — and for our ability to live our lives freely, without fear that the federal government will gun us down.”
“This is not the first time ICE has justified a shooting by claiming someone tried to run over officers, only for later evidence to prove that to be untrue.”
— League of United Latin American Citizens, on the killing of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo
I. The Body Count Is Not an Accident
Federal immigration agents have shot at least 38 people since January 20, 2025, killing nine. That is the count as of this week. It does not include the six people who died in ICE custody in the single month of January 2026 alone — a caseload documented by the American Immigration Council and detailed further by Al Jazeera — that included Cuban father Geraldo Lunas Campos, whose death the El Paso County medical examiner ruled a homicide by asphyxia after ICE first claimed a medical emergency and then, when contradicted, blamed the dead man himself.
The Wall Street Journal identified at least 13 separate incidents of immigration officers firing into civilian vehicles between July 2025 and January 2026. Policing experts have spent decades trying to curb this exact tactic in local departments; federal agents appear to have adopted it as standard practice. In the same window, at least five people shot by ICE or Border Patrol officers were, as NBC News confirmed, U.S. citizens.
A 37-year-old Minneapolis mother of three, poet, and U.S. citizen, killed by ICE agent Jonathan Ross during “Operation Metro Surge.” Bystander video contradicted DHS’s claim she “viciously ran over” an officer. The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division declined to open an investigation into the agent, and reportedly began investigating her widow instead. Coverage: Al Jazeera.
A 37-year-old VA ICU nurse and U.S. citizen, killed by federal agents on Nicollet Avenue in Minneapolis while filming a masked immigration operation on his phone. He was tackled to the ground before being shot. Both officers were placed on administrative leave. Details: PBS News.
A 43-year-old Black father of two in Los Angeles, killed by an off-duty ICE agent, Brian Palacios, at the apartment complex where both men lived. Porter’s family and lawyer say he was firing his rifle into the air in the widespread New Year’s Eve tradition, walking back to his door when Palacios opened fire. Reporting: PBS News.
A U.S. citizen shot five times by a Border Patrol agent in Chicago’s Brighton Park neighborhood while monitoring immigration activity. Federal prosecutors accused her of ramming an agent’s car; a judge dismissed the criminal charges. Her attorney is now suing for evidence release. Detail: PBS News.
Independent aggregators are doing what the government will not. The American Prospect has been maintaining a running tracker of ICE-linked deaths and injuries since January, its editors writing bluntly that they are doing so because they refuse to let the government “sanitize” what they, and Human Rights Watch, and increasingly the courts themselves, will not pretend is anything but a “terror campaign spreading across our country.” When DHS is asked for its own numbers on agent-involved shootings — fatal or non-fatal, investigated or not — PBS News reported this winter, the agency simply does not answer.
II. Masks, Ski Masks, and the Erosion of Law
Every American citizen has an interest in being able to distinguish a law enforcement officer from a kidnapper. In 2026 that has become impossible. Federal immigration agents now routinely operate in balaclavas, gaiters, ski masks, and unmarked SUVs, refusing to identify themselves as agents even when asked. This is not lawful policing tradition; it is the deliberate erosion of it. Federal regulation — 8 C.F.R. § 287.8(c)(2)(iii) — requires immigration officers to identify themselves as such “as soon as it is practical and safe to do so.” That regulation is now, effectively, a dead letter.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta has led a multistate coalition demanding Congress codify identification requirements. New York Attorney General Letitia James has led another, warning that “masked agents can pull people off the streets in unmarked cars without ever identifying themselves as law enforcement” and calling that “deeply disturbing” for the United States of America. In the Senate, the VISIBLE Act, introduced by Senators Alex Padilla, Cory Booker, Patty Murray, and Richard Blumenthal, would prohibit non-medical face coverings during public-facing enforcement and require legible agency and badge identification. Fifty-two House members, led by Reps. Dan Goldman and Rob Menendez, sent a formal letter to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem demanding the agency unmask its agents. It has done nothing of the kind.
A federal court, according to Human Rights Watch, dismissed ICE’s stated rationale for masking in blistering language, calling it “disingenuous, squalid and dishonorable.” The consequences are exactly what the state attorneys general warned about: criminals now impersonate federal agents to kidnap, extort, and sexually assault victims. Scott Shuchart, a former DHS official who served in the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, told colleagues plainly that federal government agents “dressed like paramilitaries” is “un-American.”
“As much as the cop in blues is a staple of American life, the masked bandit is a symbol of fear.”
— Scott Shuchart, Former ICE and DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Official
III. A Chronology of Contempt
What follows is not a comprehensive list. It is what has been documented, on the record, in the past twelve months — an accelerating pattern of an executive agency treating court orders as suggestions and the Constitution as a hurdle.
IV. What This Is Doing to the Country
The moral cost is the point. But the material cost is also real, and it is landing squarely on the workers this administration promised to help. The Brookings Institution’s analysis of the enforcement surge, published in May, found approximately 668,000 jobs lost across the cities they studied. Of those, between 51,000 and 297,000 would have been held by American-born workers. This is not zero-sum labor economics; this is a supply-chain collapse in industries — construction, agriculture, hospitality, meatpacking — that were already short of workers.
The University of Colorado economist Chloe East, in a new working paper covered by NPR’s Planet Money, put it directly: heightened ICE activity in this administration “is hurting the labor market and hurting U.S.-born workers, especially in sectors that have historically been reliant on immigrant labor.” The National Association of Home Builders estimates $2.7 billion a year lost to construction delays. In the ten states with the highest concentration of undocumented construction workers, employment fell while other states grew nearly 2 percent. Agriculture lost 155,000 workers between March and July of 2025 — compared with a gain the previous year. In Los Angeles, spending fell 20 to 25 percent in neighborhoods with high foreign-born populations after enforcement was announced.
Even Republican members of Congress from the border are calling this a crisis. Rio Grande Valley Rep. Monica De La Cruz has publicly warned that the raids amount to a builder crisis. Rep. Henry Cuellar has appealed to federal officials to back off construction sites, as he says they were forced to do at agricultural sites during last summer’s harvest crunch. This is what happens when governance is replaced by spectacle: the crops rot, the houses don’t get built, the schools empty out, and the small businessmen — the Lorenzo Salgado Araujos of America — end up shot in the street on the way to a jobsite.
Get Involved Today
Contribute to our mission and turn your concerns into action.
V. The Media Is Not Looking Away — But It Is Looking Selectively
It would be inaccurate to say the mainstream press has ignored these killings entirely. It would also be inaccurate to say it has covered them the way it would cover 38 shootings and nine deaths perpetrated by any other American law-enforcement agency. As the Association of Health Care Journalists observed, Renée Good and Alex Pretti — both white, both U.S. citizens, both killed in the same city within weeks of each other — became national names. Silverio Villegas González, a 38-year-old Mexican father with no criminal record shot dead by immigration agents in a Chicago suburb after dropping off his children at daycare, did not.
The independent journalist Lewis Raven Wallace, writing for Objective Journalism Review, described the pattern clearly: “Mainstream media does a lot of unspoken work in normalizing certain kinds of death and making other kinds of death exceptional and remarkable. Deaths caused by poverty, hunger, ICE detention — these have been normalized.” The New York Times, the American Prospect editors noted with fury, filed the killings in Minneapolis under the anodyne headline “Minneapolis Tensions.” Consider whether “tensions” would suffice if the shooter wore a police uniform in Ann Arbor. Consider whether “tensions” would suffice if the shooter were anyone but a federal agent.
The Twenty-Fifth Amendment Was Written for a Presidency That Cannot Govern
Section 4 of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment permits the Vice President, joined by a majority of the Cabinet or such other body as Congress may by law provide, to declare that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Ratified in 1967, it was designed for a medical crisis. It has never been invoked. Congress has also never established the “such other body” the Amendment explicitly authorizes — until this year.
On April 14, 2026, House Judiciary Ranking Member Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), joined by 50 co-sponsors, introduced legislation to create an independent, bipartisan Commission on Presidential Capacity to Discharge the Powers and Duties of Office. Its 17 members — appointed in equal partisan balance by congressional leadership and drawn from former Vice Presidents, Cabinet Secretaries, Attorneys General, Surgeons General, and physicians — would have the constitutional standing to conduct a medical and cognitive evaluation, and, with the Vice President’s concurrence, to declare the President unable to serve. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, House Democratic leadership, and — startlingly — several longtime Trump allies have all publicly raised the same question in 2026: is the man in the Oval Office capable of discharging his duties?
The Argument Being Made
An executive branch that permits masked agents to fire into civilian vehicles, that refuses court orders, that cannot account for its own use of deadly force, that has no functioning internal oversight, that watches nine people die at its agents’ hands without corrective action — that is not a policy disagreement. It is a demonstrated inability to superintend the executive branch. The Amendment’s plain text speaks of the President’s ability to discharge “the powers and duties of his office.” The chief executive is constitutionally responsible for the faithful execution of the laws. Executive agencies that defy federal courts are not faithfully executing the laws; they are, on his watch, defying them.
The Practical Barriers Are Real
Under current law, Section 4 requires the concurrence of the Vice President — currently J.D. Vance, a Trump loyalist — and a majority of the Cabinet. Raskin’s proposed Commission would give Congress a second lawful pathway, but the bill must first pass a Republican-controlled House and Senate, and cannot be enacted over a presidential veto. As Axios and other outlets have noted, this is a long-shot legislative fight.
Why the Barriers Don’t Erase the Case
A constitutional argument is not defeated by the political difficulty of acting on it. The Framers of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment did not write it to be easy — they wrote it to be available. What they did not anticipate was a Cabinet incapable of exercising the responsibility the Amendment vests in them. Congress’s role in providing “such other body” is not a partisan flourish. It is the constitutional remedy for exactly the situation now unfolding: an executive branch whose agents kill on the street, defy the courts, and answer to no one, while the man at its head is — by the assessment of members of both parties — visibly less capable of governance than at any point in his public life.
VI. Leadership Is the Word for What This Country No Longer Has
A president who was leading would not preside over an ICE agency whose agents cannot be identified. A president who was leading would not preside over a Border Patrol whose agents fire into cars. A president who was leading would not preside over a Department of Homeland Security whose stories about its own killings shift under scrutiny — from “medical emergency” to “he did it to himself” to “he weaponized his vehicle.” A president who was leading would fire the DHS Secretary, discipline the officers, restore identification, comply with the courts, and appear before the American public to explain what happened to Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, to Renée Nicole Good, to Alex Pretti, to Keith Porter Jr., and to the six people who died in a single month in his agency’s custody in January.
He has done none of these things. He will not. This is not a policy failure. It is a failure of the office itself.
Editorial Conclusion
Lorenzo Salgado Araujo was fifty-two years old. He had lived in this country longer than most of the officers who shot him have been alive. He was one appointment away from the legal status his family had been chasing for eighteen months. He was picking up his crew. He was killed in the street by a masked federal agent whose body camera did not exist, in an operation for which he was not the target, in an administration whose agents have now shot at least thirty-eight people and killed at least nine, and whose government has refused to answer to the courts, to the Congress, or to the country.
The Twenty-Fifth Amendment was written for a presidency that cannot govern. This is that presidency. The remedy is constitutional, the case is documented, and the moral question is no longer complicated. What is required is that the people who took the oath — every Cabinet officer, every member of Congress, every federal judge — do the jobs that oath binds them to. Nothing less will do. Nothing less honors the dead.
Sources & References
- CNNMexican man fatally shot by ICE was not target of immigration operation, source says
- ABC News‘He did not deserve to die,’ son of man fatally shot by ICE officer in Houston says
- ABC13 HoustonFamily says dad was scared and wanted to protect his tools, workers before ICE shooting
- Washington PostFeds sideline Texas officials in probe into ICE shooting, district attorney says
- Click2HoustonHundreds march in Houston demanding justice
- WikipediaList of shootings by U.S. immigration agents in the second Trump administration
- NBC NewsList: ICE and Border Patrol shootings as Trump doubles down on immigration enforcement
- PBS NewsShooting deaths climb in Trump’s mass deportation effort
- American Immigration Council6 Deaths in ICE Custody and 2 Fatal Shootings: A Horrific Start to 2026
- The American ProspectA Running Count of How Many People ICE Has Killed and Injured
- Al JazeeraUS witnessed many ICE-related deaths in 2026. Here are their stories
- Human Rights WatchUS: Masked Federal Agents Undermine Rule of Law
- Office of NY Attorney GeneralAG James Leads Coalition Urging Congress to Protect Americans from Masked ICE Agents
- Office of CA Attorney GeneralAG Bonta: Multistate Coalition Urges Congress to Advance Legislation on Agent Identification
- U.S. Senate — BlumenthalNew Bill Requiring ICE Agents to Display Clear Identification (VISIBLE Act)
- U.S. House — Goldman52 House Members Press DHS to Enforce Officer-Identification Policy
- Iowa Capital DispatchIowa judges take ICE to task over ‘astonishing conduct’ and violations of court orders
- The InterceptICE Flouting Federal Judge’s Order to Stop Arresting Immigrants at NY Courts
- Texas Public RadioFederal judges order pause of Egyptian family’s deportation after ICE re-arrested
- Brookings InstitutionShock, awe, and economic fallout: ICE enforcement’s effect on U.S. cities
- NPR Planet MoneyThe economic chilling effect of Trump’s immigration crackdown
- U.S. House Judiciary Committee (Dems)Rep. Raskin Introduces Legislation Establishing 25th Amendment Commission
- AxiosHouse Democrats file long-shot 25th Amendment bill targeting Trump
- Association of Health Care JournalistsHow to avoid bias when covering ICE shootings
- Objective Journalism ReviewReporting on ICE killings follows pattern of normalizing state violence
Related News
