Guns Over Butter: How Trump’s Budget
Trades American Lives for an Imperial War Machine
In the starkest reordering of national priorities since the Cold War, President Trump’s FY2027 budget annihilates the domestic safety net — eliminating heat assistance, gutting food aid for infants, and cratering public education — to finance an unprecedented half-trillion-dollar surge in military spending. The math is simple. The human toll is not.
On April 3, 2026, President Donald Trump submitted his annual budget request to Congress — a document so radical in its redistribution of national purpose that historians will likely reach for it when cataloguing this administration’s defining moral choices. According to the Center for American Progress, the proposal would cut non-defense discretionary funding — the portion of the federal ledger that pays for most of what government does for ordinary Americans outside of Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and SNAP — to its lowest share of GDP since at least the Eisenhower administration. In the same document, Trump calls for the single largest annual increase in military spending as a share of GDP outside a ground war in American history.
The president, in remarks at a private White House luncheon that were accidentally released to the press, offered the clearest possible statement of his governing theology. NPR reported his words verbatim: “We’re fighting wars. We can’t take care of day care. It’s not possible for us to take care of day care, Medicaid, Medicare — all these individual things. We have to take care of one thing: military protection.” The phrase “we have to take care of one thing” is not a governing philosophy. It is a confession of imperial ambition — and an abandonment of the constitutional obligation to promote the general welfare.
1. The Numbers Behind the Doctrine
The Trump FY2027 budget calls for $1.5 trillion in total defense spending — a $445 billion increase, or 42 percent above current levels. To achieve this, the administration would reduce all non-defense spending by $73 billion, a 10 percent cut that falls most savagely on the Americans least able to absorb it. The deficit, far from shrinking under this arithmetic, is projected to balloon: House Budget Committee Democrats estimate it would reach $2.2 trillion in 2027 alone — $400 billion higher than the current-year deficit — and $17.5 trillion over the coming decade, even assuming an implausibly optimistic 3 percent annual GDP growth.
The military surge is not tethered to a coherent strategic doctrine. As analysts have noted, Trump proposed the $1.5 trillion figure nearly two months before the United States attacked Iran — meaning the administration cannot credibly claim the spending is driven by new requirements created by that conflict. The war followed the budget. The budget did not follow the war. The order of events matters enormously for evaluating whether this represents sound national security planning or militarist spending untethered from actual threat assessments.
2. The Lives Behind the Line Items
Budgets are not abstractions. They are moral documents written in the language of dollars — and Trump’s FY2027 request is a study in who, exactly, this administration has decided to leave behind.
The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), which helps struggling families heat their homes in winter and cool them in summer, would be eliminated entirely. In fiscal year 2024, 5.9 million households across all 50 states depended on it. The program prevents people from freezing to death. It is being zeroed out to help fund battleships. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), a 50-year-old program that funds street improvements, water and sewer projects, and senior services in over a thousand municipalities, would be cut from $3.3 billion to zero. The HOME Investment Partnerships Program, which creates affordable housing, would be eliminated — at a moment when more than 771,000 Americans are experiencing homelessness.
“We’ve never in the history of this country seen spending like this, paid for by slashing health care, education and housing.”
— Rep. Becca Balint (D-VT), House Budget Committee hearing, April 15, 2026
The budget would also eliminate need-based financial aid for 1.6 million college students, cut Federal Work Study for more than 400,000 students, and strip nearly $8.4 billion from K-12 education — replacing it with a $2 billion block grant that amounts to a 76 percent net cut. Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) called it an assault on the educational foundation of American democracy. The Environmental Protection Agency would be slashed by more than half. Michelle Roos, former EPA manager and current director of the Environmental Protection Network, described the budget as part of a plan to allow polluters to decide which toxic chemicals enter drinking water and which harmful pollution enters American lungs.
The Hill’s analysis noted that cuts to scientific research would reduce the chances that American science cures cancer, Alzheimer’s, or other terminal conditions, according to the Association of American Universities. Job Corps — a decades-old workforce training program for disadvantaged youth — would be eliminated outright. The Small Business Administration, which approved 84,203 loans last year, would be cut by 51 percent, or $513 million.
Get Involved Today
Contribute to our mission and turn your concerns into action.
3. A War Machine Built on Borrowed Money and Broken Bodies
The administration has framed its military ambitions as a response to a dangerous world — and the Iran war, now entering its sixth week, provides convenient political cover. But the numbers do not support the narrative. Among the Pentagon’s more extravagant line items: $65.8 billion for shipbuilding and naval procurement — a 46 percent increase — including funding for 24 additional naval ships and initial appropriations for two vessels to be named “Trump-class battleships.” Naval analysts have broadly assessed that modern battleships are impractical for contemporary security challenges. The Trump-class battleship program has been characterized as a dangerous vanity project dressed in the language of deterrence.
The Iran war itself has already cost more than $25 billion, killed more than 1,600 civilians — including more than 200 children — and at least 13 American service members. Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent global energy prices surging, hitting working families at the gas pump. Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-PA), the ranking Democrat on the House Budget Committee, was blunt in his assessment: the president is demanding a massive increase in defense while cutting billions from health care, housing, and more. “This budget represents ‘America Last,'” Boyle said.
“This budget represents ‘America Last.'”
— Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-PA), Ranking Member, House Budget Committee, April 2026
4. A Pattern of Plunder: The “Big Beautiful Bill” and Its Sequel
This budget does not exist in isolation. It is the sequel to a legislative act that the Center for American Progress has described, without hyperbole, as the largest single transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich in American legislative history. In July 2025, Trump signed the “Big Beautiful Bill” into law — legislation that enacted the largest cuts to both Medicaid and SNAP in the history of those programs while simultaneously delivering enormous tax cuts disproportionately benefiting the wealthiest Americans. Fifteen million Americans lost their health coverage. Food assistance was gutted. And then Trump came back for more.
The cascading effects on state budgets have been severe. California faces a $10 billion budget deficit that could double depending on how much federal funding is ultimately withdrawn. New York’s budget is projected to be tens of billions further in the red due to cuts to health care, SNAP, and housing aid. And this is not a coastal-state problem: purple and red states alike are bracing for the economic shockwave. When the federal government abandons its responsibilities to the vulnerable, those responsibilities do not disappear — they fall onto states already straining under the weight of a decade of federal disinvestment.
5. A Chronology of Consequence
The 25th Amendment: A Constitutional Mechanism Whose Moment Has Arrived
What the Amendment Provides: Section Four of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that when the Vice President and a majority of the principal officers of the executive departments transmit to Congress a written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume those powers as Acting President. If the President contests the finding, Congress must then vote — and a two-thirds majority of both chambers is required to sustain the removal. The mechanism has never been successfully invoked. Its framers designed it precisely for moments when the office’s occupant presents a danger that elections cannot swiftly remedy.
Who Has Called for It: The bipartisan breadth of the current 25th Amendment discussion is historically notable. Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-AZ), the Iranian-American president of the House Democratic freshman class, was among the first to go public, posting that “The President of the United States is a deranged lunatic, and a national security threat to our country and the rest of the world.” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) called Trump’s Iran threats “the ravings of a dangerous and mentally unbalanced individual” and demanded Congress act. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) called the Easter Sunday threat the words of “a frustrated and immoral madman.” Former Republican Congressman Joe Walsh, former Trump communications director Anthony Scaramucci, former Trump ally Tucker Carlson, and even right-wing commentator Marjorie Taylor Greene — posting “25TH AMENDMENT!!!” — all called for the amendment’s invocation within a 24-hour window. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries announced a formal caucus briefing on the mechanism led by Rep. Jamie Raskin.
The Constitutional Case: The budget and the Iran war together construct a compelling case under the amendment’s original intent. A president who jokes about the 25th Amendment in his own remarks — as Trump did on March 26 — and who openly acknowledges that his war strategy would prompt removal proceedings, who threatens to destroy civilian infrastructure in a manner legal experts across the spectrum characterize as war crimes, and who simultaneously strips food from infants and heat from the elderly while funding “Trump-class battleships”: this is the profile the amendment’s architects foresaw. The question is not whether the behavior meets the legal standard of inability to discharge the duties of the office. The question is whether those with the authority to act possess the institutional courage to invoke it.
The Practical Barriers — and Why They Don’t Settle the Moral Question: The barriers are real. As CNN reported, a successful invocation requires a majority of the Cabinet and the Vice President’s concurrence — and there are no current indications that Vice President J.D. Vance, who was in Hungary during the most acute Iran crisis, is prepared to act. Without a willing Cabinet, the amendment cannot be initiated. But the practical difficulty of the mechanism does not negate the moral and constitutional obligation to name what is happening. When a president starves children to fund vanity warships, when he threatens war crimes on Easter Sunday, when he jokes about his own removal — the relevant question is not whether the mechanism will succeed. It is whether the constitutional architecture of this republic will be honestly applied to the conduct it was designed to address.
Editorial Conclusion
What Donald Trump has submitted to Congress is not a budget. It is a declaration of who matters in America and who does not. The nursing mother whose WIC benefit falls from $54 to $13 a month does not matter. The 6 million families who will lose heat assistance do not matter. The 1.6 million college students losing need-based aid do not matter. The 771,000 homeless Americans do not matter. The children in Iran killed by bombs paid for with their own government’s surrender of social welfare do not matter. What matters, in Trump’s explicit telling, is “one thing: military protection.” A “Trump-class battleship.” A “Golden Dome” that may never fly. What we are witnessing is not merely bad policy — it is the systematic dismantling of the social contract under cover of manufactured emergency. The Twenty-Fifth Amendment was ratified because our forefathers understood that a republic could be endangered from within, by an executive who had lost the capacity or the will to govern in the public interest. Whether or not the mechanism is invoked, the conduct it was written to address is present, documented, and undeniable. The American people deserve leaders who will say so plainly, and act accordingly.
Sources & References
- Center for American Progress — “Trump’s Budget Request Cuts Programs That Help Ordinary Americans and Sinks That Money Toward War”
- NPR — “Trump budget seeks $1.5 trillion in defense spending alongside domestic program cuts”
- NBC News / MS.NOW — “Trump’s new budget proposal is historic — in one of the worst ways possible”
- House Budget Committee Democrats — “Trump’s 2027 Budget Puts America Last”
- House Appropriations Committee Democrats — “Trump and Vought Propose Budget Worsening Cost-of-Living Crisis”
- Senate Appropriations Committee — Senator Murray’s Statement on the FY2027 Budget Request
- The Hill — “Trump’s budget puts war first, and Americans last”
- Federal News Network — “Trump’s budget director defends White House plan for massive boost in military spending”
- WWNY-TV — “Trump admin pushes Congress for increased military spending, healthcare cuts”
- Bipartisan Policy Center — “President Trump’s FY2027 Budget: Overview of Housing Programs”
- Social Work Blog / NASW — “Trump Administration’s FY2027 Budget: Epitome of Inequity”
- MSNBC — “Trump is making the states do the dirty work of cutting SNAP and Medicaid benefits”
- TIME Magazine — “What to Know About the 25th Amendment as Lawmakers Call for Trump’s Removal”
- CNN Politics — “An eclectic, bipartisan group suddenly calls for removing Trump using the 25th Amendment”
- Axios — “House Democratic leadership signals sudden openness to 25th Amendment push”
- Axios — “Trump 25th Amendment chatter erupts among Dems over Iran post”
- Al Jazeera — “Democrats blast Trump for Iran ‘war crimes’ threat; Republicans supportive”
- White House Office of Management and Budget — FY2027 Budget of the U.S. Government (official document)
