The Watchers at the Ballot Box: ICE Turns Its Gaze on the People Who Help You Vote
Records pried loose by Democracy Forward show ICE’s investigative arm combing nearly 100 million voter records, reviewing hundreds of civic groups, and weighing undercover infiltration, with a 2020 election denier feeding it data. Three weeks before the midterms, the question is no longer whether this administration is preparing to contest the outcome. It is how, and whether the rest of us are ready.
Somewhere inside the Department of Homeland Security there is a weekly report on voter fraud. It is circulated to ICE leadership. It tracks arrests, data sets and “priority states.” And according to 166 pages of internal records released on October 7 by the legal watchdog Democracy Forward, it describes a federal immigration agency treating America’s voter-registration infrastructure (the church volunteers, the campus clubs, the union halls, even a skateboard clothing chain) as a field of suspects.
The documents were not volunteered. Democracy Forward filed its Freedom of Information Act request in April; when ICE largely ignored it, the group sued, and the agency eventually produced the first tranche, with as many as 4,500 more pages expected in later releases. What has surfaced so far is damning enough.
I. What the Documents Show
The records come from Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), ICE’s investigative arm, in a series of reports prepared for other parts of DHS. As CNN reported, they describe a sweeping election-fraud operation that drew on tens of millions of records, scrutinized dozens of nonprofit registration groups, and contemplated sending undercover agents into organizations suspected of helping noncitizens register.
Investigators planned to find the groups using nonprofit search engines and then run them against other databases looking for what the records call “derogatory information,” according to Democracy Docket’s review. In Pennsylvania alone, HSI reviewed at least 82 organizations; in New Jersey, at least 41. The probe also reached Ohio, Minnesota and Washington, D.C. In Pennsylvania, investigators even examined the retailer Zumiez, whose offense appears to have been partnering with Voto Latino and Rock the Vote to register young people at skate events and festivals.
Scale of the Data Haul
A June 1 HSI report says investigators ingested 50.6 million records from a Justice Department dataset plus 48.4 million supplied through Heather Honey (CNN).
Groups Under Review
At least 82 organizations in Pennsylvania and 41 in New Jersey, plus groups in Ohio, Minnesota and D.C. (Dispatches from Kentucky).
Undercover Contemplated
One document says future operations may use undercover agents to engage targeted groups. Reporting has found no proof the plan was carried out (The New Republic).
The Deportation Map
A July HSI report lists voter data from MO, MI, NM, CT, GA and KY as pending entry into Palantir’s ELITE enforcement tool (Democracy Docket).
What It Actually Found
An ICE document counts 36 criminal and 56 administrative voter-fraud arrests this year, against 155.2 million ballots cast in 2024 (American Democracy Minute).
New Jersey’s Verdict
Of the 41 New Jersey organizations reviewed, an internal document states no derogatory information was found on any of them (Baller Alert, citing the records).
The targets were not abstractions. Education Minnesota, the state’s teachers’ union, learned it had been investigated only when Democracy Forward told it. The Pennsylvania chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations was flagged for further investigation. And in Ohio, the probe overlapped with the FBI’s June raid on the Ohio Organizing Collaborative, a registration group whose staff and volunteers were questioned and whose devices were seized, as American Democracy Minute documented.
II. Heather Honey’s 48 Million Records
The most unsettling line in the June 1 report is also the vaguest. Of the roughly 99 million records HSI ingested, 48.4 million came from Heather Honey, now a senior counselor to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and a senior adviser to the ICE director. She obtained them, the report says, through “independent sources of information”. Nothing in the documents identifies those sources, explains how the data was collected, or clarifies whether the two datasets overlap, as election-law scholar Rick Hasen noted on the Election Law Blog.
Democracy Forward’s release notes that HSI treated Honey’s trove as a “strategic line of effort” and that DHS personnel sought to add officials working under her to the distribution list for HSI’s weekly voter-fraud reports.
Who is Heather Honey? She is the Pennsylvania activist whose 2020 “research” misrepresented incomplete state data to claim Pennsylvania had more votes than voters, a falsehood Donald Trump cited while trying to overturn his loss. When DHS installed her in an election-integrity post in August 2025, David Becker of the Center for Election Innovation and Research warned that the department appeared poised to “spread disinformation rather than combat it”. Fourteen months later, the person whose bad data fueled the Big Lie is routing tens of millions of Americans’ records, from sources no one will name, into a law-enforcement pipeline.
Hart Wood, Democracy Forward’s senior oversight counsel, said the records offer “chilling new insights into the breadth and depth” of the administration’s push to pursue baseless fraud claims and assert federal control over elections. That is, if anything, understated.
III. Palantir and the Deportation Map
Multiple documents reference plans to load state voter-roll data into ELITE, a Palantir-built system that, by the company’s own description, exists to locate foreign nationals who meet criteria for removal. A July HSI report listed data from six states as “pending Palantir entry into ELITE,” per Democracy Docket.
Fairness requires noting the rebuttal: a Palantir spokesperson told CNN that voter-roll data has never been integrated into ELITE, and the records themselves do not establish whether any transfer was completed. But intent matters. A government that plans to drop your voter registration into a map built to find deportation targets has already told you how it views the act of registering. And the separate court filing alleging ICE stored dossiers on people who observed its operations in another Palantir system shows these tools do not stay in their lanes.
“I will, if the elections are honest.”
— President Donald Trump, asked whether he would accept the 2026 midterm results · via Truthout / NBC News
IV. Why This Reaches Every American
It is tempting to read this as a story about activists. It is not. Your voter file (name, address, often birth date, party, voting history) is almost certainly sitting in one of those 99 million records. You were never told. You were never asked. You cannot opt out. And you have no idea what “independent sources” were stitched to it.
The danger runs in several directions. Citizenship-verification data is notoriously error-prone; Senate Democrats have pointed out that DHS’s own USCIS materials concede the data may be inaccurate. Naturalized citizens, people with common surnames, recent movers and married women whose names changed are the most likely to be falsely flagged, and a false flag in an immigration-enforcement system is not a clerical nuisance. It can mean a challenged registration, a knock on the door, or worse.
Then there is the chilling effect, which is the point. When a Texas county election office hands specific voters’ files to ICE agents, as Axios reported happened in Webb County, Texas, and Forsyth County, North Carolina, every naturalized citizen and every mixed-status household in those communities gets the message. When the volunteer at the library table learns her group might be infiltrated by federal agents, she thinks twice about volunteering next Saturday. Democracy Forward has warned that putting registration groups under federal scrutiny could discourage their work and intimidate eligible voters. No arrest is required for that to work.
Get Involved Today
Contribute to our mission and turn your concerns into action.
V. The Midterm Stakes
Look at the map ICE drew. Its priority states for these datasets included Texas, Pennsylvania, California, New Jersey, Minnesota, Michigan, Arizona, Florida, Georgia and Ohio: nearly every state that will decide control of the House. Democracy Forward’s release also says HSI may be examining voting machines and seeking to prove fraud in “counties with 2020 results,” a phrase that only makes sense if the goal is relitigating the last election to delegitimize the next one.
Registration drives disproportionately reach young voters, new citizens, renters, and Black and Latino communities. Intimidating the groups that do this work suppresses turnout among precisely the voters the administration expects to lose. Meanwhile, an evidence base of “suspected noncitizens” built from unverified data becomes a ready-made justification for post-election challenges: lists to wave at cameras, counties to target, certifications to delay.
What the Law Forbids
First Amendment · NAACP v. Alabama (1958)
The Supreme Court held that compelled exposure of a civic group’s members can violate the freedom of association, precisely because surveillance chills lawful organizing. Registering voters is core protected political activity. Investigating groups for doing it, with no individualized evidence of crime, sits on the wrong side of that line.
Elections Clause · Art. I, § 4
States set the “times, places and manner” of congressional elections, subject only to laws Congress passes. Nothing in the Constitution authorizes an immigration agency to assemble a national voter dossier or to police registration drives.
18 U.S.C. §§ 592–593 · Troops at the Polls
Federal law makes it a crime for any federal officer to station “any troops or armed men at any place where a general or special election is held,” except to repel armed enemies of the United States, and separately bars the armed forces from interfering with elections. Many election-law experts read “any place” to include drop boxes and counting centers.
52 U.S.C. § 10307(b) & § 20511 · Voter Intimidation
The Voting Rights Act and the National Voter Registration Act prohibit intimidating, threatening or coercing anyone for voting, attempting to vote, or urging or aiding others to register or vote. That last clause protects exactly the organizations HSI put under review.
Privacy Act of 1974 · 5 U.S.C. § 552a
Federal agencies must publicly describe the records systems they maintain and the routine uses of that data. Ingesting 48.4 million records from undisclosed “independent sources” into an enforcement program raises serious questions about whether those obligations were met.
VI. Congress: What Democrats Are Doing, and Not Doing
Congressional Democrats, locked in the minority, have done what minorities can do: write letters, file suits, introduce bills that the majority buries.
In July, House Homeland Security Ranking Member Bennie Thompson, with Reps. Lou Correa and Delia Ramirez, demanded DHS turn over records on potential ICE deployments to polling places after the department admitted in court that it held thousands of such documents, despite repeatedly telling lawmakers no plans existed. Last month, Sens. Ruben Gallego, Gary Peters, Dick Durbin, Alex Padilla, Chuck Schumer and 29 colleagues wrote Secretary Mullin demanding he halt what they called “calculated efforts to undermine confidence in our elections”, challenging his unsupported claim of 250,000 noncitizen registrants and an “Unlawful Voter Initiative” exposed by a whistleblower.
In June, Sen. Elissa Slotkin and fellow Democrats introduced legislation requiring congressional approval before any troop deployment to the polls, after Republicans on the Senate Armed Services Committee blocked two amendments to ban troops at polling places. Democrats have also run closed-door tabletop exercises for scenarios including armed federal personnel near polling sites, and the DNC has sued DHS, DOJ and the Pentagon for records of any planned deployments. On the House side, Rep. Josh Gottheimer has teamed with Republican Rep. Don Bacon to urge members to pledge to accept the results whoever wins.
That is not nothing. But it is not enough. Letters are not subpoenas, and there has been no forceful, unified Democratic demand that Heather Honey testify under oath about her “independent sources.” Nor has the caucus made the protection of voter data a hard condition in every must-pass funding fight, or put a single, coordinated public warning in front of voters about what these records reveal. The documents dropped six days ago. The response should be deafening. So far it is a murmur.
VII. Laying the Groundwork to Contest the Count
The surveillance of registration groups does not stand alone. It is one plank in a platform that has been under construction all year, and the President has narrated much of it himself.
The Post Office. Here precision matters, because accuracy is our advantage. These are not soldiers. They are armed private guards from Prosegur, a multinational security firm with a record of alleged human-rights abuses, deployed at some 55 USPS facilities in cities including Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, Phoenix and Tampa. The Postal Inspection Service says the deployment is part of an overall security plan and “not specific to elections”, and there is no evidence the guards have touched ballots. But Frank Albergo of the Postal Police Officers Association says no one from the Postal Service will supervise them, describing “private contractors in and around ballots without any federal control”. Mail ballots are moving through those buildings right now.
The polls. Gen. Caine’s assurance is real and welcome. But the President has not ruled out deploying troops or federal agents, and NPR reported growing concern that unrest at polling places could be used as a pretext to invoke the Insurrection Act. In Washington, D.C., where the President directly commands the Guard and nearly 3,000 troops remain deployed, Guard officials told the Washington Post the soldiers at the Foggy Bottom drop box were merely on a patrol break. Perhaps. But D.C.’s elections board felt compelled to formally ask the military to stay away from voting sites, and that sentence should never have to be written in America.
The drumbeat for martial law. At a Las Vegas “Storm Summit,” Trump’s longtime friend and attorney Peter Ticktin, along with LindellTV host Wayne Allyn Root and the pardoned election-equipment tamperer Tina Peters, laid out scenarios ending in federal seizure of the vote. Votebeat reported today that this activist circle has the President’s ear, and that Trump has left the door open to drastic action. The White House says these figures play no role in election policy, and Trump has announced no plan to declare martial law. But when asked about Root’s call for a national-security emergency, the President did not say no.
“Either martial law, or step aside.”
— Peter Ticktin, Trump’s longtime friend and attorney, to The Atlantic · via Raw Story
VIII. What This Says About His Priorities
Consider what this government chose to spend its investigative capacity on. Not fentanyl networks. Not child-exploitation rings. Not the trafficking cases HSI exists to pursue. It aimed a federal law-enforcement apparatus at teachers’ unions, Muslim civil-rights chapters, and a mall store that sells skate shoes, in search of a crime that its own records show is vanishingly rare. In New Jersey, after reviewing 41 groups, it found nothing at all.
That is not a public-safety agenda. It is a political one. A president confident in his record would want the widest possible electorate. A president who tells reporters he will accept results only if he deems them honest, who says he should have seized voting machines in 2020, and whose Homeland Security leadership feeds a 2020 denier’s data into an enforcement system, is telling us he intends to be the sole judge of whether the voters got it right.
Leadership in a constitutional republic means submitting to the verdict of the governed, especially when it stings. Every president before this one has understood that the peaceful transfer of power is not a courtesy extended to the winner; it is the obligation that makes the presidency legitimate in the first place. What these records show is an administration preparing, methodically and with taxpayer money, to avoid that obligation.
IX. What You Can Do
Fear is the intended product here. The single most effective response is to refuse to be afraid, and to make your vote too early, too documented and too numerous to challenge. Here is the plain-language plan.
Verify your registration this week
Check your status on your state election office’s website or at vote.gov, and check again a few days before Election Day. Purges and erroneous flags happen quietly; catch yours while there is still time to fix it. Screenshot the confirmation.
Vote early, and track your ballot
If your state offers early in-person voting, use it. If you vote by mail, return it now rather than near the deadline, use an official drop box or your county election office if you are worried about mail delays, and sign up for your state’s ballot-tracking service so you know it was received and counted.
Know your rights at the polls
If you are in line when polls close, stay in line: you have the right to vote. If your eligibility is challenged, you can ask for a provisional ballot and follow up to make sure it counts. Armed federal personnel have no lawful role at polling places. If you see intimidation, call the nonpartisan Election Protection hotline at 866-OUR-VOTE and report it to your Secretary of State and Attorney General.
Protect the people doing the work
If you volunteer with or run a registration group, talk to a lawyer now about how to respond if federal agents make contact. You are not required to consent to a search without a warrant. Organizations like Democracy Forward are actively litigating these issues. Then keep registering voters: lawful registration work is protected, and the documents show investigators found little to nothing.
Show up beyond your own ballot
Sign up as a poll worker or trained, nonpartisan poll observer through your county. Drive a neighbor to vote. Call your senators and representative and demand two things: sworn testimony from Heather Honey about her “independent sources,” and a binding commitment that voter data will be purged from any immigration-enforcement system.
None of these steps will stop an administration determined to contest the results, and you cannot remove your record from the voter file without un-registering. What these steps can do is shrink the margin for mischief: a high, early, documented turnout leaves far fewer close counties to challenge, far fewer “irregularities” to manufacture, and far more witnesses. The courts and state officials, not the White House, certify elections. Your job is to hand them a result too clear to deny.
Editorial Conclusion
An immigration agency has no business cataloguing the voters of a free country or casing the volunteers who help them register. Yet that is what these documents describe: nearly 100 million records, hundreds of civic groups, undercover operations on the drawing board, and an election denier at the controls, all assembled as the President announces in advance that he will accept only the results he likes.
This is not election security. It is the scaffolding for overturning an election. Congress must compel the full record into the light and put Heather Honey under oath. States must refuse to hand over their voters. And the American people must answer surveillance with turnout so overwhelming that no lawyer, no guard, and no proclamation can explain it away. A democracy does not survive on the hope that its leaders will respect the vote. It survives because citizens make the vote impossible to steal.
Sources & References
- Democracy Forward — Democracy Forward Obtains Groundbreaking Records Detailing ICE’s Attempts to Silence Voters (Oct. 7, 2026)
- CNN — ICE reviewed tens of millions of voter records looking for noncitizen voters, records show
- Democracy Docket — ICE amassed millions of voter records in sweeping fraud hunt, documents reveal
- Democracy Docket — ICE probed hundreds of voter registration groups across the U.S.
- Democracy Docket — ICE tried to share voter data with Peter Thiel’s Palantir, new documents show
- Democracy Docket — ICE at the polls? Even after FOIA lawsuit, agency refuses to give a straight answer
- Election Law Blog — Rick Hasen on ICE’s review of tens of millions of voter records
- News From the States — Documents show DHS probed nonprofits, obtained millions of records in hunt for noncitizen voters
- American Democracy Minute — Chilling New FOIA-Obtained Documents Show Multi-State Investigation of Voter Registration Organizations
- The New Republic — ICE Secretly Investigated Hundreds of Nonprofits Across the Country
- NBC News — Researcher who has distorted voter data appointed to Homeland Security election integrity role
- Axios — Exclusive: ICE obtains local voter files
- Raw Story — Fears swirl as armed guards swarm USPS weeks before midterms
- The New Republic — USPS Hires Security Service With History of Human Rights Abuse
- Votebeat — Election activists press Trump to ban voting machines or even declare martial law (Oct. 13, 2026)
- Raw Story — White House desperate to distract Trump as outside allies clamor for ‘martial law’
- Task & Purpose — National Guard says it is ‘actively addressing’ incident of troops near DC ballot drop box
- The Washington Post — US military has no plans to send troops to the polls in November, top general says
- NPR — Fears grow that Trump could use military to influence the upcoming election
- Center for American Progress — The Trump Administration Is Interfering in the 2026 Midterm Elections
- Truthout — Trump Says He’ll Only Accept 2026 Midterms If He Deems Them “Honest”
- House Homeland Security Democrats — Thompson, Correa, Ramirez Demand DHS Turn Over Records on Potential ICE Deployment to Polling Places
- Sen. Ruben Gallego — Gallego, Colleagues Demand that DHS Halt 2026 Election Interference Efforts
- MS NOW — Senate Democrats accuse DHS of already interfering with the midterms
- Michigan Advance — Slotkin, Senate Democrats seek curb on troop deployments at polling places
- NOTUS — Democrats Mobilize Over Fears Trump Will Deploy Troops to Polls
- The Hill — Bipartisan lawmakers push colleagues to accept midterm results
- Dispatches from Kentucky — When the Government Starts Investigating the Groups That Help People Vote
- IBTimes UK — ICE Obtained 50M Voter Records as Documents Expose Proposed Palantir Data Transfer
- Baller Alert — ICE Quietly Investigated Voter Registration Groups Nationwide
- AURN News — Democracy Forward: ICE Investigated Voter Registration Groups, Considered Undercover Operations
Related News
